Do they extend care towards the emotions of others, especially when reciprocation is absent?

Do they experience sorrow for individuals who may not deserve it?

Can they recount moments in their life where they've formed profound connections and grasped the emotions of others? What sets these instances apart?

Can they imagine another person's situation ?

Have they encountered circumstances where they felt challenged and helpless, experiencing emotional distress?

How proficient are they at recognizing and acknowledging the emotions of others, even when they are of different gender, race, religion, or nationality?

If a deficiency of empathy is apparent, they may remain indifferent. 

Is their aptitude for critical thinking robust?

Do they hold strong preconceived beliefs and biases?

Do they primarily rely on information from mainstream media and news outlets?

Are they adept at identifying logical fallacies or deceptive techniques that may be present in the information they consume, and do aware of common misconceptions.

Do they diligently verify information from independent research, fact-checking organizations, or credible sources before accepting it as fact?

Have they taken into account the historical and cultural context surrounding the news they consume, understanding that media can be influenced by a multitude of factors, including political, economic, and social forces?

Are they actively refining their critical thinking skills and media literacy to differentiate between factual information and propaganda, and are they open to questioning and analyzing the news they encounter?

If there is a lack of critical thinking capacity, they may remain indifferent. 

Do they understand news coverage is tailored to resonate with the perceived biases or preferences of their target audience.

Do they know that Journalists usually show sources and information which are easier to access, also influenced by both quantity and character of their reporting

Do they know most of the news media is controlled by pro -Israel groups actively strive to cultivate a positive image of Israel and can exert their influence on media narratives.

Do they realize a lot of advertisers have a huge influence on what is covered and what is presented ?

Option: "Conformist - Traditionalist"

This moral stance places group norms and values above personal desires for belonging and harmony.

Values and guidelines are derived from religious, political, or institutional ideologies, acting as safeguards against the chaos of self-interest.

Loyalty to authority and adherence to institutional laws are paramount; those who deviate must face repercussions to preserve group harmony and ethical standards.

External groups with differing values can be seen as potential threats to group survival.

The primary moral objective is the service and protection of the group, with personal identity regarded as institutional property, and participation in wars is deemed noble.

The elimination of external groups with contrasting ideologies is considered justifiable for long-term peace and protection.

Option: "Conscientious - Progressive"

This moral standpoint originates from subjective experiences, emphasizing self-derived morality that prioritizes rationality and efficiency over harmony and loyalty.

Values are rooted in recognizing the interconnectedness of all human life, emphasizing cooperation and unity for the well-being of all beings and ecosystems over individual or group interests.

The ethical decision-making process encompasses diverse perspectives, values the uniqueness of each situation, promotes a non-judgmental culture, seeks solutions for the greater good, and acknowledges the complexity of moral frameworks within a comprehensive worldview.

Equal access to justice and fairness is advocated regardless of race, gender, religion, or social status, with a strong emphasis on compassion and empathy to alleviate suffering. They advocate compliance with institutions that serve human interests, while also challenging or reforming unfair or inefficient systems.

The primary moral goal is to foster solidarity with various groups and institutions, addressing global challenges such as climate change, poverty, hunger, and striving for the sustainable development of the world for future generations.

If they choose "Conformist - Traditionalist," they may remain indifferent. 

Do they belong to a group benefiting from societal privilege that bestows advantages in various areas?

Wealth privilege, affording advantages in goods, services, and influence for the wealthy.

Elite privilege, held by the most powerful individuals in society, enabling impactful decisions often without public consent or knowledge.

In the world of entertainment and business, maintaining a broad appeal can take precedence, leading to prioritization of image and profitability over potential losses in support.

If they possess any form of privilege, they may remain indifferent.

AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs iCommittee): A leading organization within the Israel lobby, known for its significant role in advocating for the U.S.-Israel relationship.

J Street: A political advocacy group that champions a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, exerting influence on U.S. politics.

ZOA (Zionist Organization of America): One of the oldest pro-Israel groups in the U.S., focusing on education and advocacy, defending Israel's actions and countering anti-Semitism.

CAMERA (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America): A media-monitoring organization that challenges perceived bias against Israel in various media outlets.

CUFI (Christians United for Israel): The largest pro-Israel grassroots organization in the U.S., mobilizing members to support Israel through lobbying, donations, and media content.

TIP (The Israel Project): An educational organization providing factual information about Israel and the Middle East through media materials and advocacy training.

JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security of America): Focused on the strategic significance of the U.S.-Israel relationship in terms of national security.

Individual Contributors: Donors with a strong pro-Israel stance who contribute to political campaigns, supporting like-minded candidates.

Membership in or support from these influential groups, they may remain indifferent.

Are they facing overwhelming challenges in their own circumstances or perhaps experiencing the bystander effect?

Financial Instability: Those living paycheck to paycheck often prioritize immediate financial concerns, such as basic necessities and bills.

Limited Time and Resources: Balancing work, family, and caregiving responsibilities leaves little room for additional engagement. Consider a single mother working a minimum-wage job while caring for dependent children.

Fear of Retaliation: Advocating for change may bring fears of reprisal from authorities or one's community, discouraging action.

Lack of Trust in Authorities: Some lack confidence that their concerns will lead to a meaningful resolution, reducing motivation to act.

Concern for Personal Safety: Engaging in awareness activities may bring them closer to crime, raising concerns for their safety and mental well-being.

Culture and Language Barriers: Cultural norms and language differences can deter participation, as it may be seen as disruptive or challenging to express their views.

Immigration Status: Immigrants or migrant workers, whether legal or not, may fear job loss and deportation.

Accessibility Challenges: People with disabilities, those suffering from PTSD and chronic pain, or the homeless in shelters or on the streets often face considerable hurdles in taking action.

If they are experiencing any of these conditions, they may remain indifferent.

Who remains oblivious to the true state of affairs?

These are the individuals who confine themselves within their familiar circles, limited to their networks, friends, family, and conventional news sources, without seeking out fresh insights.

Those who lack awareness, They may remain indifferent.